Tuesday, February 04, 2014

Santa Fe Reporter article on my trip to Cambodia! 5.11.2011

It's a bit late in coming, but I did want to share some of the results of our work in Cambodia. It's long and quite heavy, but hopefully as moving to read as the work itself. At the very end is a letter I received from an official working in Phnom Penh. Very nice words! Please share your thoughts.

Journey to Cambodia; learning the power of trauma and the healing of testimony

by Zelie Pollon
05.11.11-Journey-to-CambodiaPhoto by Alan M Thornton
Ask him again.
But we’ve already asked him.
Ask him in a different way.
But it doesn’t happen like this in our culture.
What do you mean? There is no cause and effect in Cambodia? I want to know how his treatment under the Khmer Rouge has impacted his life. I’m just not sure I’m asking the right question.
But he said there is no impact.
It’s not true; ask him again.
I was into my third hour interviewing a survivor of the Khmer Rouge regime, and everyone was tired. The survivor, a farmer from a province three hours north of Phnom Penh, had already described the most horrific experience––his pregnant wife’s stomach being cut open and the fetus removed by soldiers who planned to dry and consume it, supposedly to gain magical powers.

He spoke in the most matter-of-fact tone, though he was clearly upset, clenching his jaw, twitching in his seat and furiously rubbing tiger balm across his forehead and under his nose. I probably shouldn’t have pushed, but he had come seeking help. He wanted to tell his story, and I wanted to give him the opportunity to name what he was feeling and to admit that the horrors inflicted on him and his family under the Khmer Rouge were still impacting him. But he hadn’t considered the length or detail of such an interview, or that he would be asked to scrutinize his suffering. I looked at the evidence of his agitation––tiger balm now smeared across every inch of his face––and said that we were done. He was free to leave.

I was in Cambodia working through one of the country’s few psychosocial organizations, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO Cambodia), to record people’s testimonies about war. The patients who came to TPO were primarily witnesses chosen to testify in the country’s war crimes tribunal, called the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, or the ECCC. Charges had been brought against a handful of surviving Khmer Rouge leaders, those deemed most responsible for the deaths of nearly 2 million Cambodians in the mid to late 1970s. Across Cambodia, the details of life under the Khmer Rouge regime were emerging through court testimony and in the press. TPO had been asked to counsel witnesses from the start and, each day of the six-month trial, staff members sat inside the courtroom, available for questions and support. The organization found itself bombarded with calls from people suddenly unable to sleep, overcome with anger and aggressive behavior, suffering from severe headaches or crying fits. Everyone wanted to know how to stop the pain.

TPO, overwhelmed and understaffed, agreed for me to work with them last summer as fieldwork for my research on storytelling in postconflict societies. It was one of the few organizations I had found trying testimony therapy, a method used to illicit traumatic memories and allow survivors to begin healing. My job was to interview and photograph official witnesses, as well as those rejected by the court process but who still desperately needed to have their testimonies heard. The goal was to compile historic records, aid emotional healing and encourage other Cambodians to speak.

I recruited a talented photographer friend and colleague, Alan M Thornton, to join me in Phnom Penh to create the survivor portraits, then packed up my then 3-year-old son and headed to Asia.

What I thought would be an experience similar to what I’d done in Iraq years earlier, documenting survivor stories and history, became a much larger journey into the politics of trauma and secondary trauma, and the immense differences in how cultures define, respond to and treat illness.


Som Vorn was jailed for taking a coconut to feed has family. While he was incarcerated, his wife and child were brutally, ritualistically murdered.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Cambodia’s Silent War
During the years of 1975-1979, Cambodia suffered one of the most brutal and effective genocidal terrors in the history of mankind. Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge army killed up to 2 million people through execution, torture, forced labor and starvation. Pot separated families, removed all intellectuals (even those who wore glasses were threatened), documented meticulously the torture of thousands of individuals, and sent hundreds of thousands into work camps in the countryside. The physical onslaught stopped when Vietnam invaded in 1979; but the psychological scars have yet––more than 30 years later––to be reckoned with.

 The Cambodian government calls it a kind of reconciliation that its citizens, majority Buddhist, prefer silence to evoking any “spirit of revenge.” Today, former Khmer leaders have found their way back into positions of power without much outcry, and many textbooks devote no more than 10 lines of description to the years of the regime.

Some who have pushed for public displays of remembrance have been accused of trying to provoke violence. Rather than partake in any meaningful process to reconcile the past, the prime minister (himself former Khmer Rouge) once famously stated that victims of the regime should “dig a hole and bury the past.”

While survivors may have found a coping mechanism in keeping stories of their experience to themselves (particularly while those who committed atrocities have yet to be prosecuted), succeeding generations are demanding more accountability. Many feel that accurate documentation is one important way to make sure history is known, and to ensure that something like Pol Pot’s regime is never repeated.

It was into this setting of silence and repression, beginning to lift under court testimony, that Alan and I walked. Our entrée into Cambodian society was through TPO’s director, Dr. Sotheara Chhim. I had first written to Dr. Chhim after reading his expert testimony on trauma for the ECCC during the trial of Kaing Guek Eav, better known as Comrade Duch.

A survivor of the Khmer Rouge and one of the country’s first psychiatrists, Dr Chhim was formally trained as a medical doctor, but came upon so many cases of post-Khmer Rouge psychological disturbances that he turned to psychiatry.

“After the regime ended in 1979, Cambodians had lost the structures that would have allowed them to heal from trauma. There was no family, no teachers, no doctors, no monks, no honoring of the dead, no comfort, no closure and no justice. The very institutions that would help Cambodia recover from the immense trauma no longer existed,” Chhim told the court.

One of Chhim’s methods of treatment included testimony therapy.

Testimony therapy was first developed by Chilean psychologists Elizabeth Lira and Eugenia Weinstein following the Augusto Pinochet regime. Using the pseudonyms Cienfuegos and Monelli, the two initially set out to interview former political prisoners in order to document the oppression. They realized the process of giving testimony seemed to help the survivors of the regime: It restructured an idea of self and provided new perspectives about the past in a person’s own voice, replacing the voice of the perpetrator.

In Cambodia, testimony therapy is combined with a public reading and sometimes a purification ritual. TPO’s participants were taken to the notorious killing fields, where thousands of people were murdered during the regime. There, a Buddhist monk blessed the testimonies and the survivors. During one session, a man wailed for two hours without pause. He phoned TPO the next day to offer thanks. After 30 years, he said, a painful thorn had been removed from his heart.

For me, working in Cambodia was a chance to see first-hand how testimony therapy worked in postconflict societies, and if such a process could be administered by nontherapeutically trained professionals. Cambodia was a window into how one could face and overcome trauma through testimony, even decades later.


Sotheara Chhim is a Khmer Rouge survivor who now assists others through testimonial therapy.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Troubles in Translation
First, I needed a translator. Initially, I thought this would be someone who could translate Khmer words into English––the talent for which was rare enough given the country’s ambivalent embrace of education. I heard stories of parents still too fearful of another intellectual purge to allow their children to attend school. But I quickly realized I required much more than language skills.

I needed someone who could be a cultural translator around medical issues, world visions and thinking patterns. I had already traveled extensively in Southeast Asia, but I still needed someone to explain to me how Buddhist notions of karma let grievous crimes, particularly against children, continue on a daily basis. Or to tell me that Cambodian interview subjects never wanted to be left alone in hotel rooms because they feared roaming ghosts. Before we even began, I had to learn that the term PTSD doesn’t carry weight in Cambodia; rather, it is a country suffering from Baskbat, broken courage.

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder might be the most maligned malady the world over––and the most diagnosed, particularly in war-affected areas. Psychosocial interventions like the one I was conducting with TPO often have been accused of jeopardizing local coping mechanisms, pathologizing and stigmatizing war-torn communities, and conveying a purely Anglo-American therapeutic ethos. Labeling illnesses in Western terms has been called a form of “medical imperialism.”

Cambodians perceive trauma as a manifestation of unhappy spirits––not something covered on standard American PTSD questionnaires or in Western medical calculations. Doctors working with TPO learned to ask subjects if they had “been thinking too much”, had “wind attacks” or whether they felt “Khmaoch songot”––a term for describing a sudden inability to move or speak, sometimes in tandem with the appearance of dark shapes.

During my time in Iraq, I found Iraqis to be passionate and expressive, sometimes over-the-top melodramatic, but always engaged with their own emotions and with me. In Cambodia, the trauma was like an outside creature, allowed to emerge and sit on a sterile table to be analyzed for the purpose of our interview, but then politely put back again at the end of the day. I wasn’t sure how to react to the monotone descriptions of terror and trauma—that people could remember every province, commune, district and village to which they were sent during the regime, but sometimes forgot how many of their children were killed. There was a cyclical nature of telling, starting with the day one was born and winding on for hours through farming practices, or with former Khmer soldiers, military tactics; meandering past the years of trauma, always conveyed matter-of-factly, and around to the present day. Then: Was there a sleeping pill they could have? An antidepressant? And could they go home now, please?

The interviews wore me down, little by little, making me a bit colder every day.

This was secondary trauma, and I was beginning to realize the ways it was manifesting in my psyche. I would become frustrated with the lack of clarity and would push to connect people’s disjointed thoughts. I focused maniacally on organizing the testimonies at the expense of hearing the content, letting it settle and feeling the ways that the words played in my body. I didn’t like myself at these protective moments, but I was sure that, if I let myself go, it would open a floodgate that could never be shut. I didn’t want to be emotionally “out of control” in a country holding itself together through a guise of absolute restraint.

The photographer, Alan, had never encountered such detailed accounts of atrocity—so many, so often and so unthinkable. The impact of it all stayed with him for months after his return. If not for my fearless son Aiden, I’m not sure I would have made it. Returning at the end of the day to a bounding little boy, eager to share his new Khmer words and go riding in his go-cart around the pagodas of Phnom Penh, was like rainfall in the desert: life-giving oxygen.


Sith Yam’s testimony of survival broke the author’s defenses with its intimacy.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Awakening
Then small cracks in the pervasive restraint began to appear, and I found real connection. The first opening occurred when a man allowed his anger to flow with such poetic beauty, I was awestruck. He was a taxi driver, the most spontaneous interview we collected––and one of the most powerful. This man described his revenge fantasy with such intensity and detail that I felt hypnotized, moved by his emotion and deep, brutal honesty. His was the only interview I wanted to confirm before publishing, needing to be sure that he understood the danger of his words and to make sure we had been clear of possible countrywide distribution. Yes, he understood and, yes, all he wanted––in fact ever since he lost his family to the Khmer regime––was for his words to be heard.

Another interview broke my own defenses. It wasn’t just the telling––a story of one mother trying to keep her two daughters alive, of touching their legs as they slept to make sure they hadn’t died in the night. It was that she reached out and touched me on the leg. It was a simple gesture, but all of her pain, memory and terror was embodied in that touch. She could see it enter my body and she smiled, still holding my leg as my tears began to flow, as if to remind me that I was the one who needed comforting.

Her touch changed me, and changed the way I viewed the project. The previously incoherent dichotomy of restraint and bursting trauma merged into a real sense of a beautiful, strong and resilient people. Those who shared with us were brave beyond comprehension, some of them revealing their experiences for the first time ever. For them, it was the process of speaking that was more important than what they detailed. The act of coming forward and asking for help was like a rocket lifting to the moon: one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.

I redoubled my commitment to the practice of testimony. It wasn’t just the transfer of factual and practical knowledge, but the space it provided for the voices of those usually unheard—the poor, the illiterate, the marginalized and those left out of any political or legal process. I wanted “truth” to document Cambodia and other war-torn countries, but I came to accept that not all testimonies need to be “factual.”

The oral historian Allessandro Portelli once wrote that “the importance of oral testimony may lie not in its adherence to facts but rather in its divergence from them, where imagination, symbolism, desire break in. Therefore there are no ‘false’ oral sources…The diversity of oral history consists in the fact that ‘untrue’ statements are still psychologically ‘true’ and that these previous ‘errors’ sometimes reveal more than factually correct accounts.”

For me it was an awakening moment, of love and acceptance, of fatigue and accomplishment. Alan and I could worry over logistics and organization later, but we had found the right path. Our work as witnesses to testimony was merely to stay open––and openhearted—enough to hear.


Survivor Stories

 Dr. Sotheara Chhim   42, Phnom Penh

I always dreamed of being an architect or maybe a civil engineer. The Khmer Rouge changed that. I think less than ten doctors survived. People returned home with illnesses and there was no one in the hospital. My mother said I had to study medicine. At first, I did surgery in the provinces. When I worked, I saw a lot of clients who became psychotic and ran away, and a lot of suicides. We thought maybe it was a curse from black magic. We didn’t understand it…
So I was one of the first to be trained in psychiatry.

Cambodians are still affected by the Khmer Rouge and its legacy. Many think Cambodians are OK and not traumatized because they can smile. But it’s not true. The pain is under the surface. The problem doesn’t go away. It comes back with a trigger, like during the tribunal…Here, it’s a concept called Baskbat, broken courage.

The work of healing is ongoing. There is no time limit to the work on the effects of the genocide. Healing will never be too late and healing can still be achieved.

 Som Vorn   Age and Residence Unknown

In 1978, I was jailed for taking a coconut. Then they checked my background and saw that I was the son of farmers and my parents were good people. Maybe picking just one coconut wasn’t enough to be part of a CIA network. The leader of the prison came to me and said they had been confused and not to be angry.

While I was away, they took my wife and 3-year-old son. She was pregnant, and they cut her stomach open and took the fetus. They believed it gave them magical powers and protection. Then they filled her stomach with grass.

The genocide was possible because, by killing the people mentally, you can kill more than if you kill them physically. It still affects people today because you lost your courage and you didn’t get it back. Today, we still feel defeated.

Chin Meth  53, Kampong Thom

When I first saw fighting, I was asked to dig a trench and get inside. I was so afraid to shoot that gun, I just shot at the sky. At night, when I slept, I saw myself carrying bombs. Now, when I’m sad, I smell the bombs and I imagine that place. And I remember carrying the guns…

After the evacuation, we were asked to collect everything from the houses: clothes, gold, rice, everything…then we had to put them separately. Some things stayed with the leader. We didn’t ask where it was. It belongs to Angkar. Then we were ordered to clean the city, the hotels, the streets. It was so quiet. I felt like it was a dead city.

Before my testimony, I always covered my face when I went to the market. I hid until the lawyers encouraged me to speak. Before the Khmer Rouge court, I had anger in my heart. Now, I can come here (to this prison) because I’m happy and my heart is free. During the regime, I worked so hard in these fields planting rice. Now, I come here and I just see my homeland.

Sith Yam  60, Kampot

I would save my own dinner and then, at night, bring it to my children. I would touch them when they slept and rub their legs to make sure they hadn’t died in the night from the watery porridge. One night, I touched my daughter on her leg. It was solid and did not move. I was so scared she had already died. I twisted her leg and she woke up. I was so startled and happy, I started to cry.

Every day, I was praying for someone to help get rid of the regime. I just wanted it over. When the Vietnamese finally came, I walked for a month until I could reach my village. Now, I tell my children you have to fight back and not let the Khmer Rouge return.

Sun Phy  42, Banteay Meanchey Province

I have no memories now. Our only memory was about food. What I knew was that my house was by the river. I think it was in Kratie (Krah-chey). I remember freshwater dolphins in my village, but I haven’t been there yet. I wanted to print out papers and hand them to people all along the river, but I don’t have enough money.

Can you imagine when my children ask where I come from, I cannot say? Can you imagine not having a homeland, no relatives? I believe there might be some of my relatives alive. If I could find my homeland, then maybe I could find them.

I feel so upset with myself. Other children who were sent abroad who can’t speak Khmer can find their relatives. I’m Cambodian, I’m here, and I still can’t find them.


Yun Bin survived after being left for dead in a mass grave.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Yun Bin  55, Kampong Chhnang Province

I couldn’t see anything; I just knew there was a pit in front of me. There was a soldier with an ax, and then I fainted. I felt my soul running to tell my parents that I was not being taken to be educated, but to be killed. Four more bodies were dropped on me and I regained consciousness, but my soul was already gone.

I tried to kick the bodies off of me and scratch the string off my hands. It smelled horrible. The warmth of blood and fat was all over my body. I looked up and heard someone yell to kneel, then I heard the breaking sound, like someone breaking a coconut, and then another body was thrown down.

I started to pray to my ancestors, to the Buddha, to anyone. I prayed that, if the bodies could help me get out, I would seek justice for them.


Elaborate revenge fantasies have sustained Ou Seng Thy.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Ou Seng Thy  46, Kampot Province

After the regime ended, I started searching for my father. I met some friends who had survived, and they told me my father had been killed. Pol Pot soldiers took a palm leaf and cut his throat. When my mother heard this, she collapsed. This was 1983, and I was 18 years old. I was so angry, I became a soldier to take revenge.

I want the Khmer Rouge leaders who are accused, like Duch, to be judged and tortured. His flesh should be cut little piece by little piece until his death. We should do to them whatever they did to us. For example, one youth was arrested and he was tortured; his penis was burned with fire. If they cut our ears, we cut their ears a little; if they hit us, we hit them a little; if they burned us, we burn them a little back. We do that little by little until their death.

Sok Sop Eal  70, Kampong Ke Village

Of all my memories, the most painful is when they stopped me from praying, and they forced me to eat pork and feed the pigs. All jamia Muslim were forced to eat pork. They wanted to hurt us, insult us and cause us pain. They wanted to keep us from praying. All religions, even Buddhism, were forbidden.
When I was a soldier with Lon Nol, the other soldiers told me that Pol Pot was a bad man and without religion. But I didn’t believe them; I regret that now. I can’t believe the Khmer Rouge regime existed without religion.


Sou Sotheary suspects she was raped by multiple soldiers as punshishment for being transexual.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Sou Sotheary  70, Phnom Penh

Maybe soldiers knew about my transsexuality because, one day when I was collecting stones on the mountain, seven or eight soldiers came and raped me. I fell unconscious and, when I woke up, I was covered in blood. I crawled back to the house on my hands and knees and told [my lover]. He had been in the house making baskets. He held me and we both cried. That night, we started to discuss how to escape.

 Kang Seth  63, Chhouk District

In 1978, I was ordered to be a soldier to fight in the south against the Vietnamese soldiers. After one week, I ran away. I was caught by another group of Khmer Rouge soldiers and ordered into the Malik mountains to carry big stones. I also cut the forests and carried soil. We had to work so much with so little food. I assumed the Khmer Rouge thought we would die there, so they just made us work. To them, we were already dead.

When I was in prison, I belonged to the “old people,” so I wasn’t treated as badly. The others, they tied their hands behind their backs and pushed them off the roof of the prison. The ones they pushed were mostly kids and old people. I heard their voices. Being back here [at the monastery] reminds me of what happened. I still feel fear when I see it again. I don’t trust people around me—anywhere.

 Phok Khorn  57, Siem Reap Province

I didn’t tell anyone about my forced marriage or when they put me in prison. I just wanted to forget and not feel the pain. The villagers knew I was a Pol Pot soldier but they didn’t know my experience.

In the past, when I thought about Tuol Sleng prison I cried. When I first went there, TPO sent someone with me. It reminded me so much of the past. TPO arranged a religious ceremony, and I just cried.

Most of the Pol Pot soldiers wore these tattoos to protect against spirits and from getting hurt in battle. I guess mine didn’t work! [Laughs!]

In 2006 when I first told people my background for the tribunal, my family was so surprised. Now, it’s time to find justice.

 

Nam Mon was imprisoned and raped. Her brother was a prison guard.
Credits: Alan M Thornton

Nam Mon  48, Phnom Penh 

My brother was a prison guard, and he told me that my father was in the prison. When I went to work to give people medicine, I saw him. He was so skinny because there was no food. He told me not to come to the room because, if they knew that he was my father, they would kill the family. I didn’t say anything. So I stopped going there. I asked one of the guards to give him medicine.

In the early days, after I was put in prison, they thought I was a boy. I had short hair and I looked like a boy. They took me to the bath and made me take off my clothes. I didn’t. But after they discovered I was a woman, they raped me.



Letter received in May 2011

Hello Zelie,

Thank you for sharing the story of your work at TPO with the world.  You have an uncommonly high degree of empathy, and you are a very perceptive person.  The story was well told, and rock solid.  I am very particular about how these kinds of stories are told by outsiders.  Rarely are they told as well as you have in the Santa Fe Reporter piece. 

Twenty years ago, I decided that there should be an international tribunal for the Khmer Rouge leaders, and I have been working on it ever since.  That journey has taken me down many strange paths, from getting the Cambodian Genocide Justice Act passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1994, through founding the Documentation Center of Cambodia in 1995, and much more in the years that followed.  After so many years of thrashing around in mass graves while bereaved family members wail on the edge of the pit, or negotiating with very frightening warlords, I have to say that I am intimately familiar with the idea of secondary traumatization.  Fortunately, my wife is a mental health professional, so she helps to keep me functional amidst the craziness of what I do.  In 2006, I arrived with the International Co-Prosecutor to help him establish his office, and since then I have served as the chief of investigations for the prosecution at the ECCC.  Over the years, I have interviewed hundreds and hundreds of survivors, both victims and perpetrators, and the many who are both.  I am personally acquainted with four of the people whose stories are shared in your article, including, of course, Sotheara.  One of those, however, resonated very strongly with me; Yun Bin’s description of being executed is the most evocative I have ever heard, and it has earned a place in the Opening Argument for the prosecution in Case 002, which I am currently writing. 

Be all of that as it may, I just wanted to convey to you my appreciation for your story, and try to give you some idea of the credentials underlying that appreciation.  Keep up the good work.  I will look forward to seeing your book when it appears here.  For now, however, back to our preparations for the Case 002 trial, which as you are no doubt aware, begins on June 27. 

Thanks again,

Craig.

xxxxxx, Investigator
Office of the Co-Prosecutors

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Thursday, October 04, 2012

a post from the past: Cambodia

I found this in my drafts box and figured I should post it now that I'm beginning my new blog at www.zeliepollon.blogspot.com
Sorry it wasn't timely and didn't include more info and photos. Cambodia was quite overwhelming for me and also an amazing experience. Suppose it's till unfinished business...





This is a testimonial therapy session held at the Killing Fields, just outside Phnom Penh. The survivors are blessed by the monks before they enter a Pagoda and have their survivors stories read.












Here the stories are read by a counselor as all present bear witness. The testimony is then further blessed by the monks. This man is being supported after an immense emotional moment.





Aiden and I head to the beach where Mr. Social quickly befriended two Khmer-Australian kids.

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

War, enemies and the truth about Santa Claus


“Mom, is Santa Claus Really real?” Aiden asked me with such sincerity and concern that I was taken aback. Do I lie to him in the name of perpetuating a kid fantasy? Do I set him up for disappointment when he learns the real truth? Or should I just let him enjoy the fun of a mythical Santa (perhaps making it my own by, say, telling him the Norwegian/David Sedaris version of Santa as a giant Black man). Oddly, I just had no idea how to answer the question.

Then again, we've broached topics recently that have left me speechless.

For example, while shaving my legs in the bath the other night, Aiden came in to supervise.

What are you doing?

Shaving my legs.

Does it hurt?

No, only when I’m not careful and I cut my leg.

Cut your leg?!

This is a razor and it’s very sharp. It can cut your leg if you’re not careful.

Like Tim’s leg?

Sorry? What do you mean?

Like Tim’s leg? Did a razor cut his leg off?

Our friend Tim is a former Marine whose leg was blown off in Vietnam. He recently updated his prosthetic with a fancy contraption that probably cost about as much as my home. So now he likes to show it off, and Aiden is fascinated. Aiden heard that Tim stepped on an explosive device, but there’s no real place for that in the mind of a four year old. Might as well have been a razor that cut off the limb. In fact, the shrapnel probably functioned in exactly the same way. So we continue.

No, his leg was cut off by an explosion, though there may have been a piece of metal that was just as sharp as a razor.

So where is his leg?

I think it fell far away.

Did he go get it?

Well, Tim fell unconscious. He wasn’t able to.

What’s unconscious?

In some cases the body is so shocked it kind of falls asleep to protect itself. He didn’t wake up until he was in the hospital.

But where did his leg go? What happened to it?

Well, um... maybe animals ate it. I'm not really sure.

War is certainly a topic of our times, and a topic of my life, but answering questions with honesty and without inducing fear and horror is another thing entirely. What happened to his leg? It’s a perfectly logical question for a four year old. In later years we might ask, what happened to his soul – and how can we get it back into his body and into his heart? What do we do to repair the fabric of his mind? and thankfully he only lost his leg and not his life. But those aspects are too big and esoteric for a four year old. He wants to know, Why was there an explosion? Were they bad people? Why did they want to hurt him?

I wished I could call Tim and have him come over. Not that any of us have the answer to these questions. And none of us knows which detail might lodge into the mind of a young boy and stay there for years, maybe a lifetime. With Aiden’s mind and consciousness developing I think it’s important to start sharing information about the fact that some people aren’t so good, that some ideas aren’t so good, and that fighting is rarely if ever a way to solve problems. Fighting hurts people and guns hurt people, and when we aren’t kind to each other our words can hurt people. And is that really how we want to be with the people around us?

But what about enemies? he asks. What if we just hurt our enemies?

*

The other day in a café, a young man at the table next to us started asking Aiden about his new books. Within minutes, the two had gone through the I Spy booklet and with Aiden now climbing into the stranger’s lap had moved onto a Berenstein bear book warning children about how to avoid strangers.

The young man laughed under the weight of Aiden’s body, now reclined into his arm. “Yes, it’s important not to trust strangers,” he chuckled, looking at me. Always attentive to the subtlest of sentiments, Aiden climbed off of the man’s lap and came to mine. I read him the book myself, emphasizing that not all strangers were kind and that they could hurt him, and how he could yell if anyone ever tried to get him to climb into a car or otherwise lead him away. I felt sick by the end of it. Sick because I hated conveying that message but I think it’s important. I know that preparing my son for a life of war, caution and the possibility that there are strange people out there set on hurting him is what I need to do. But suddenly war seemed easier to explain. The absurdity of fighting was much easier to rationalize than the kind of illness that leads people to hurt children. Surely there is some overlap, but how do we know if someone is an enemy, and why should we spend any time or energy trying to define this? No one is our enemy, right?

But what about the people who took Tim’s leg? he asks.

Sometimes it feels too much and these topics of dangers and strangers, enemies and why there are wars, are not subjects on which I want to make too many mistakes. We go, we talk, we are gentle, and sometimes things slip. Like last night:

Why was she talking about the end of the world, mom? When is that?

There's no end of the world, honey. It all just keeps going. So yes, let’s ask Tim. Let’s ask him again about his leg.


(beautiful photo by the wonderful Jennifer Esperanza)

Monday, March 14, 2011

Help Survivors of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia


Cambodia project needs your help to become a book! Help us help TPO.

Most of you know that Alan and I spent last summer in Cambodia interviewing and photographing survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime. We collaborated with a great organization called TPO (Transcultural Psychosocial Organization), one of the few in Cambodia doing mental health work, which the country desperately needs. Now TPO wants to use our work to promote what they do best, which is helping the survivors, and particularly those who are having massive memories come up around the country's war tribunal.

Please help us help them. We need to help TPO raise $2500 to print 200 hundred copies of a hardback book with the images and stories of survivors. It’s an historic account and also speaks to the power of storytelling for psychological healing. This book will go to all the people we interviewed, to the donors who made our work in Cambodia possible, and then to TPO to help them promote their work. In fact, the organization has been asked by the UN to present something at an upcoming conference in Geneva. We would love for them to have a printed book of our work to offer.

We’ve set up a paypal account to make this easy (send through alan@amtproductions.com once you have an account). Then we’ll send the funds directly to Cambodia and get the print run underway. Alan and his designers have already adjusted the layout and sent a PDF to the printer. This is a great way to support an organization that has such immense and difficult work to do – and also to support our work and all the efforts we put into this project to help survivors of war. Any amount would be greatly welcome!

Thank you all for following us and supporting us! If it goes well, we'd love to reprint it here in the states and have copies available for friends and supporters.

Call either me or Alan with any questions (or if you'd like to donate but can't manage paypal, like my mother).

Zélie - 505-699-1662

Alan - 505-470-0659






Saturday, September 04, 2010

Some things I will/will not miss in Cambodia


I'll be wrapping everything up in the coming week and a half (while also trying write my dissertation proposal!) and so it seems appropriate to reflect a bit on times here in Cambodia.

Many things can be separated into miss and won't miss lists, but so many other sights and sounds just can't be labeled. It has been a wonderful experience overall, and an amazing education on culture, history and the work I want to do collecting oral histories of trauma victims. But those lessons will need their own post. For example, there are still a few things that I can't get used to during interviews. For example, when someone we’ve interviewed can remember every province, commune, district and village to which they were sent during the KR regime, but then forgets that two of their previous children were killed. Or when someone asks after we conclude an interview if I believe their story. This still pains me so much, and really represents the magnitude of some people's search for recognition and acknowledgment. It also shows the importance of listening work, and of giving people the opportunity to tell their stories.

More on this as I reflect on my work here, but first a few things I will and will not miss. :)

Some things I will be happy to leave behind:
-Pollution
-Crazy traffic
-Witnessing moto accidents (luckily no major injuries)
-Complete lack of communication between people – even speaking the same language
-The look of fear, suspicion and sadness on people’s faces
-MOSQUITOS and sand fleas
-Visits to the hospital where the “doctors” knowledge is often questionable at best
-Aiden's various rashes/bites/infestations/otherwise unexplained maladies.
-Spending personal money on projects organizations say will be covered and NOT getting reimbursed. Nope, definitely won’t miss that.
-Living in hot muggy climate with no air conditioning
-Lack of good organic, clean food
people pinching, grabbing, hitting Aiden as an expression of their "love" and "adoration"
-Similar people grabbing Aiden's private parts. Apparently a male "bonding" thing. (In my country there's a word for it. It starts with a "p" and ends with "philia")
-Having to contend with the possibility of political censorship with every interview, presentation, thought of exhibit, etc.

But the above-mentioned have been largely overshadowed by some amazing and wonderful experiences with lovely people and incredible countryside. Here are some things I will very much miss about Cambodia:

-Those frogs at night, whose call sounds like someone running their finger across a stand up base.
-Riding in a tuk tuk every day, everywhere
-Smiling people who love kids! After the UK, this was the greatest joy.
-Open air markets with lots of color
-Mangoes and fruit smoothies
-The Cambodia daily newspaper – a really great paper for a country with serious censorship issues
-Restaurants with outdoor play spaces for kids.
-The riverside walk at about five pm when the light is just right, and especially right after a rain when the sky feels clean (er).
-The temples of Angkor, especially Angkor Thom.
-Hearing Aiden speak some Khmer (his “English-speaking” babysitter doesn’t speak any English).
-Hearing Aiden speak some French
-Hearing Aiden speak some Spanish (Dora videos)
-A beach! Sand/Sun
-Good friends, old and new, and lots of laughter
-Ice cream, and lots of it
-Sitting in my chair watching the torrential rainstorm move across the sky and come directly into my living room
-Vietnamese coffee (any coffee, really.)
-That little market in Takeo with bowls of snails, and veggies from Vietnam
-Motorcycles! Seeing how many people can fit on one small motorbike – SIX is my top! As Alan says, seat belt laws are for ninnies
-Elephants!
-Testimony therapy ceremonies at the killing fields
- The "crew", a great group of people who helped with aiden, with translation, with photographs, and with everything else we needed in Cambodia. Thank you Vandy, Tongny, Sinoun, Channut, and Judith. We will miss you guys, but hopefully will be back to continue our work sometime in the near future!
-And most of all I will miss interviewing amazing people with incredible stories. So many brave and open hearts giving their time and sharing their lives.
Thank you all!


Sunday, August 01, 2010

Khmer Rouge Tribunal response

Note: I’ve tried several times to upload photos and each time I’ve crashed the system. One of these days the conflict between me and technology will call a fragile ceasefire. Until then I’ll (and you’ll) just have to settle for text.

The Khmer Rouge Tribunal was surely broadcast across the states and various countries. One of Cambodia’s most notorious leaders during the khmer rouge regime was finally handed a verdict for his crimes. He was found guilty of overseeing (though not directly causing, the court was eager to point out) the deaths of about 14,000 people and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Considering illegal detention and time served the sentence was reduced to about 19 years. Fourteen thousand people and the best case scenario is that he’ll serve 19 years. There is also the possibility that he will be pardoned on the king’s birthday, which is quite possible and something Cambodians fear. The larger implication is that Duch could walk out of prison during his lifetime, a thought that makes survivors here both rageful and distraught.

If the verdict weren’t bad enough, the court ruled against any meaningful reparations, claiming the defendant was indigent. Now, claimants weren’t asking for much: a wall at Tuol Sleng prison with the names of the dead, for example, or a small pagoda built to honor the dead. The court offered instead to list the names of the dead on their website – as if most the people living in the country even had a computer or access to the internet!!

They also offered to record the “remorseful sayings” of Duch in a book for the claimants. I assume they would leave out the request for full amnesty that followed his last “remorseful saying.” Ugh. What a mess.

And to top off the beauty of the event, out of 92 claimants 26 of them were rejected on the day of the verdict. Meaning that their claims were denied on Lord knows what grounds, despite the fact that they had been participating in the proceedings for the previous NINE MONTHS. My first interview following the verdict was with one of the rejected civil party members; it turned into suicide counseling when she threatened to kill herself inside the Tribunal so her story would be known!

Court officials made grand gestures about the sound legal nature of the decision, and the great impact and influence it would have on the Cambodian legal system for generations to come. Perhaps all that is true, but claimants don’t really care about that. No, I don’t think there would have been a verdict that satisfied all Cambodians. Forty years (the maximum under Cambodian law) might have been accepted by most, but some people I interviewed still felt anything short of death (and I won’t even get into the details of how one subject described how that death should be experienced) was too good for the man. “He can still tuck his clean shirt into his slacks, can eat well and sleep on a nice bed,” this man said.

If reconciliation was one of the goals of a court procedure, then this court failed in huge measure. What Cambodians want and need is recognition for what they suffered during the Khmer Rouge regime. They have been told to forgive, forget, and move on. “Dig a hole and bury the past,” as the prime minister once famously said. But that cannot be done until the past is acknowledged. Cambodia is a country in a state of Post Traumatic Stress. Stuffing the truth down even further is not the answer. The country needs to get more creative and dedicate some of its rapidly growing wealth (which oddly seems to remain in government coffers) to healing its population. It will benefit the country in the long run to honestly reconcile with its past. It will heal souls and return the “courage” that has been taken from the Cambodian people and that they so dearly need back.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

First Survivor interviews

The beach was a great reprieve from city life -- and Aiden’s three hour afternoon naps didn’t hurt either! It was with a bit of disappointment that we had to head home, but that night, July 2, Alan was arriving and we had to prepare the house.

Alan settled in nicely, seemingly adjusting the heat and hustle with ease. We hit the ground running, and on the following Tuesday had our first interview at Tuol Sleng prison with Chu Mey, one of only twelve of the prison’s survivors and one of only four survivors still living. Starting out with new (and heavy) audio equipment was a bit of a challenge, but even more than that were the attempts at trying to get someone who has interviewed literally hundreds of times give answers that were not canned. The fact that I knew much of his chronological story and in reality was searching for the sub layer never quite sunk in – or perhaps was never accurately translated. Indeed, working with the translator was a challenge—not as difficult as with the first translator I interviewed, but difficult nonetheless. I could never be sure if it was the subject who was resisting the answers or the translator encouraging, even unconsciously, avoidance. The interviews always reverted back to the details of the life story and we could rarely penetrate any deeper. After five hours of dialogue (and I couldn’t help notice my lunch turning stone cold as it sat beside me, my stomach grumbling) my patience was tried and I simply didn’t know what else to do to turn the tide. This isn’t to say I didn’t hear an amazing story from someone who is lovely and open and so eager to share his tale for the world to hear. It’s more that I’m being confronted with a culture that does not easily express emotion. To do so is considered brash, weak or worse: akin to an illness, for which the Khmer Rouge would kill.

That said, Chu Mey was the first to tell me that it was only through the presence of TPO counselors at the trial that he could tell his testimony at all, and it is through telling his story that he has found meaning and strength to go on. This is a common refrain, and this is in fact why I am doing what I’m doing. The healing powers of storytelling… In the US we call it psychotherapy, but it’s more than that. It’s the act of telling and being listened to with a sincere interest to hear. It’s about presence and believing someone’s story. One survivor described his two years in a prison in Siam Reap then ended with: do you believe my story? Duch wants people to believe that the things we say didn’t happen. I tried to imagine the living this man’s experiences – horrible enough in and of themselves – and then being told that I was exaggerating or even lying. Insult to injury but with a layer leveled at destroying the self.

Yes, I believe his story. Yes, I believe everything he said, even if there are other cases and times when I do in fact have my doubts. So it’s also about acknowledging someone’s experience, being able to honor what someone has gone through, and to say to that person that in telling their story there may be some kind of redemption and some kind of reconciliation.

The most fear I saw in someone’s eye was from a woman who served as a Khmer Rouge soldier until she herself was imprisoned and tortured. She was one of the lucky ones, and was able to stay alive until the regime ended. She married her husband shortly after the Vietnamese invasion but tells me that it was only in 2007, after her photo in Tuol Sleng was identified and she was encouraged to testify at the tribunal, that her husband learned she had been a soldier – and she learned that he had had a wife and child before her, both of whom were killed by the Khmer Rouge. This detail struck me more than many others, and as we rode back home in the tuk tuk I wondered aloud, “Can you imagine being married for almost thirty years and never sharing your personal experiences under the Khmer Rouge with your partner? If you suffered, had nightmares and difficulties sleeping because of your post-traumatic stress [as she acknowledged], then how would you explain that? If you rarely left your house or covered your face for fear of being identified by others, then what would you say by explanation? We in the West – and particularly among my highly communicative friends – are very focused on notions of clear communication and honesty, particularly in relationships. So where would this fit in, this idea of survival through silence? growing silent trees, as they called it here. When is it that the survival is assured (or as assured as any survival can be) and the silence is all that remains? Or is it as one survivor noted, “the khmer rouge never left. They are in all the high government positions, so why would we think it’s safe to start speaking about our experience now?”